Skip to main content

Are Women Minorities?

At lunch today, my husband announced that two of his colleagues - one male, one female - were debating the question, Are women minorities? The man said yes, women are minorities while the woman said no, they are not.  "Of course women are minorities," my husband said with a "duh" tone in his voice. "No, no they are not," I replied. And thus the debate turned personal.

The problem was, I couldn't fully explain why I felt that way - so I asked for time to collect my thoughts. Having thought about and researched this for the better part of the day, I can say with confidence that no, women are not minorities. My reasons are not based on  pure emotion, but are sound and based on plain reason and logic.

My need to (yet again) prove my husband wrong led me to consult dictionary.com,  in order to clearly define the term "minority." The dictionary provided five unbiased and commonly agreed upon definitions of the noun minority:

  1. the smaller part or number; a number, part, or amount forming less than half of the whole.
  2. a smaller party or group opposed to a majority, as in voting or other action.
  3. a group differing, esp. in race, religion, or ethnic background, from the majority of a population: legislation aimed at providing equal rights for minorities.
  4. a member of such a group.
  5. the state or period of being under the legal age of full responsibility.
To properly investigate definition number one, I consulted the United Nations Statistics Division. Based on simple math, the average ratio of women to men worldwide is about 1:1.  In fact, in the US, the female to male ratio is 103:100. Based on a strict dictionary definition, it would seem that men are the numeric minority in the United States. But in the big scheme of things, 103:100 is not statistically significant, so let's eliminate the first definition and move on...

The second definition, a smaller party or group opposed to a majority, as in voting or other action, still does not apply based on numbers, but also in the sense that, contrary to popular male thought, most women are not opposed to men. Only men who are jerks.
The third definition gets more to the heart of the debate - a group differing, especially in race, religion, or ethnic background from the majority of the population. Sex is clearly not mentioned in this definition. Was this an oversight on Webster's part? I highly doubt it. And once again, the relatively equal ratio of women to men nullifies the concept of "differing from the majority of the population."

If definitions 1-3 do not apply, then 4 cannot apply, either.

Finally, the fifth definition applies to some females...but it also applies to some males. And since the average female to male ratio also applies to minors, then this definition is also not applicable.

Let's face it. The question is not really about minority vs. majority, but about balance of power (or imbalance as the case may be).  White men have held the power over women and minorities for hundreds of years. Consider imperialism - the white men were always outnumbered by the natives (making them the minority), but because the white men had more advanced weaponry, they held the power. When white men created the US Constitution, they created equality for themselves, but left out women and minorities. Again, not because they outnumbered the women, but because they overpowered them.


That, in 2010, we must even debate whether or not women are minorities is the outrage. When the world can stop its divisive categorizing everyone into majority and minority, male and female, black and white, straight and gay,  us and them - and instead live as one in humanity, then, perhaps, we can solve the problems of the world and attain those elusive things the world so desperately needs: Understanding. Love. Peace.

Dedicated to my political soul-mate and BFF Truly. I got your back, sistah!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

La Rafle du Vel d’Hiv (The Vel d’Hiv Round Up)

Photo Source: 1st Art Gallery
Every Holocaust survivor – every ghost of those who did not survive - has a story to tell. Each story is unique, yet equally tragic. Some we have heard more than once, while others lay silent, buried in the dusty pages of a nation’s shame…
Occupation and Anti-Semitism 14 June 1942 marked the two-year anniversary of the Nazi occupation of Paris. By this point, many French had joined the Résistance, while others felt it in their best interest to collaborate with the Nazi regime. Many Jews had fled France, and those who remained behind lived in chronic fear. The Jewish Decrees (France's version of the Nuremberg Laws) saw the Jews of Paris stripped of their livelihoods, property, and rights. As in other occupied areas of Europe, the French Jews were required to wear the yellow stars of David. Inscribed with a single word in the center, Juif (Jew), the badges had to be sewn neatly on the left side of the chest. Failure to do so could land a person in jail – o…

Les Femmes Tondues

It is no great secret that some French collaborated during the Nazi Occupation of France. Some did it for less than admirable reasons, such as political gain, anti-Semitism, or true fascist ideology. Other people were frightened and saw no end to the Occupation, while some were motivated simply by the desire to survive. Many women who collaborated fall into the latter category. Food, clothes, and fuel (among other items) were scarce during the Occupation. Nearly everything needed to sustain life was rationed, and much of France's food and other necessary commodities were shipped to Germany. One way to ensure warmth and a full belly was by making nice with a German soldier. 
In a desperate attempt to survive, some French women took on German soldiers as lovers. It return, the soldier ensured the woman's basic needs were met. Not all women had affairs for material gain - some simply slept with German soldiers because they were lonely. Either way, these sexual liaisons produced man…

La Belle Époque

Introduction Marion Cotillard's character in Midnight in Paris wants to live in La Belle Époque France as she believes it to be Paris' Golden Age. She won't get much of an argument from me - although I'd be more inclined to say I'd like to visit (not permanently reside in) La Belle Époque.
In English, La Belle Époque translates to The Beautiful Age and  arose out of the burgeoning Industrial Revolution. It spans post-Franco-Prussian War (1870-71) through the onset of WWI (1914). And beautiful it was...well, if you were not poor urban workers, anyway.  The People
The ever-expanding bourgeoisie adopted many of the values and ideals from their Victorian neighbors in the north and their own aristocracy (they were aristocratic wannabes). They valued morality, propriety, and modesty, and spent their leisure time partaking in wholesome activities such as strolling through les jardins du Paris (think Maurice Chevalier in the opening scene of Gigi where he sings his creepy, yet…