Skip to main content

Medieval Anti-Semitism in France


Author's Note: In case I do not make this abundantly clear in the essay below, let me take a moment to make clear that there is NO historical evidence whatsoever to support the many false legends of  blood libel & ritual murder. It is blatant anti-Semitic propaganda that, to this day, is wrongly perpetuated by an ill-informed and ignorant minority.             
Medieval Europe was no friend to those of the Jewish faith, and France was no exception.  In May 1171, the Jews of Blois, France were accused of ritual murder. According to a Christian soldier-servant in a report to his master, the Jews of Blois had crucified a Christian child as part of their Passover ritual, then dumped the body in the Loire River. The servant claimed to bear witness to this horror when he was at the river watering his horse and saw a Jewish villager dispose of said corpse. This event, chronicled by Ephraim ben Jacob, provides modern historians with a rare primary source account of Jewish life during the Second Crusade. This particular description of the events at Blois highlights several important factors, which indicate that this so-called ritual murder was in fact a fictitious story created as a result of anti-Semitism. According to ben Jacob’s account, the servant was eager to report this fallacy to his master, who harbored ill feelings toward a Jewess named Pulcelina. The master immediately told Count Theobald V. Despite Theobald’s fond feelings toward Pulcelina, he was persuaded by his wife Alix, King Louis VII’s daughter, to hold the Jews accountable. First, though, he needed to be certain that the servant was telling the truth as there was no other evidence (Marcus). The next phase of the story brings to light an interesting occurrence.
A Catholic priest came forward to help determine whether or not the servant was telling the truth about what happened at the river. It was determined that the servant would be placed in a tank of holy water. If he floated, it meant he was telling the truth, but if he sank, it meant he was lying. This is terribly fascinating because typically, it worked the opposite way so that a guilty party would float and an innocent party would sink (Marcus). This strongly suggests that the priest, who added a certain “legitimacy” to the legal process, was keen on working with Theobald V and the other Christian anti-Semites to find guilt with the Jews.
With the finding of the “truth,” the Jews were implicated in the ritual murder, and sentenced to death. However, as was customary, they were offered a way out by means of conversion. Ben Jacob claims none converted, while Marcus notes that a Christian historian of the time claims some did convert. Regardless, approximately 32 innocent Jewish men, women, and children were sacrificed by fire. Perhaps most significant is the fact that this was, indeed, the first accusation of ritual murder involving blood libel in continental Europe, not to mention the first death sentence as a result. Although blood libel accusations had existed in England, France was the first nation on the European mainland to formally take action on such a case. Although the first case of false ritual murder claims against the Jews, it would not be the last in France nor in continental Europe.
When Philip Augustus Capet (King Philip II of France) came to power in 1179 – a mere eight years after the ritual murder case in Blois - he needed to fill the royal coffers as well as secure his place on the throne. He did so by persecuting, and ultimately expelling, the Jews of France. A monk named Rigord, the self-proclaimed “Chronicler of the King of Franks,” described the events that took place leading up to the expulsion of the Jews (Hyams). Philip studied the ways of the Jews and concluded that they were evil and within the first year of his reign arrested and incarcerated the Jews of France and relieved them of their wealth. He did offer them a means out of jail by way of paying a steep ransom (Marcus).
In 1181, Philip further burdened the Jews of France by making null and void all loans that Jewish bankers had granted to Christians. This was devastating to Jewish bankers as it wreaked havoc on their livelihood, yet things were only going to get worse. In 1182, Philip II not only confiscated all Jewish lands, but issued a decree of expulsion of all Jews from France. Philip II did, however, offer Jews another option. Rigord wrote,
“When the faithless Jews heard this edict some of them were born again of water and the Holy Spirit and converted to the Lord, remaining steadfast in the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ. To them the King, out of regard for the Christian religion, restored all their possessions in their entirety, and gave them perpetual liberty.” (Marcus)
By 1198, Philip II readmitted Jews back to France, presumably for the economy’s sake, but tightly regulated their banking to ensure that the State was financially compensated. In fact, Marcus notes that some of this wealth acquired from the Jews may have been used to build the Louvre. As the Middle Ages progressed into the thirteenth century, the plight of the French Jew continued to decline.
     The Lateran Council of 1215 forced the Jews of Europe, including France, into ghettos and restricted which trades they were allowed to enter, forcing them to predominately rely upon money lending. During 1240, Pope Gregory IX ordered that the Talmud be examined for blasphemes. The pious French King Louis IX (Saint Louis) eagerly followed the orders of the Pope and in 1242 the Talmud and other Jewish holy books were condemned and burned in large quantities (Marcus, 163-8). Throughout the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, various Kings of France intermittently expelled from and recalled to France its Jewish population. The Jews were repeatedly accused of various crimes targeting Christians, such as poisoning wells in conjunction with the spread of the Black Death. In short, the Jews of Medieval France were “victims of popular as well as royal wrath” (Jones, 90).

  The first expulsion of the Jews from France is particularly significant because it set a trend that England would follow in 1290 and, most infamously, Spain would follow in 1492. Once the French kings flexed their political muscle and found they could easily bully the Jewish minority out of, and subsequently back into, France at their whim, other nations followed suit. Kings of France continued to find legal means to control Jewish livelihoods and confiscate Jewish wealth. The kings did this all with popular support, not to mention the encouragement, or at least the blind eye, of the Roman Catholic Church. By engaging in such hateful behaviors against the Jews, the French State set a dangerous precedent that would haunt France, Europe, and the Jews for centuries to come.

Follow on Bloglovin

Sources:  
Hyams, Paul R. “Rigord and His ‘Deeds of Philip Augustus.’“ (1998). 25 July 2012.
Jones, Colin. Paris: The Biography of a City. (New York: Penguin Group, 2005). 90
Marcus, Jacob. The Jew in the Medieval World: A Sourcebook 315-1791. “The Expulsion of the Jews From France, 1182 CE.” (New York: JPS, 1938). 24-27. 25 July 2012.
Marcus, Jacob. The Jew in the Medieval World: A Sourcebook, 315-1791. “Ephraim ben Jacob: The Ritual Murder Accusation at Blois, May 1171.” (New York: JPS, 1938). 127-130.25 July 2012.
Marcus, Jacob. The Jew in the Medieval World: A Sourcebook 315-1791. “The Burning of the Talmud, Paris 1239-1248.” (New York: JPS, 1938). 163-68.


Comments

Anonymous said…
WRONG ! There is plenty of evidence that JEWISH RITUAL MURDER (JRM) is not just a historical fact, but also that it is still happening now and on a large scale. Read Chapter 6 of Mullins 'New History of the Jews', study the 1955 Chicago case and read 'A resident in Constantinople', in which ex-rabbi Noe Weinjung explains the what and why of ritual murder.

Popular posts from this blog

La Rafle du Vel d’Hiv (The Vel d’Hiv Round Up)

Photo Source: 1st Art Gallery
Every Holocaust survivor – every ghost of those who did not survive - has a story to tell. Each story is unique, yet equally tragic. Some we have heard more than once, while others lay silent, buried in the dusty pages of a nation’s shame…
Occupation and Anti-Semitism 14 June 1942 marked the two-year anniversary of the Nazi occupation of Paris. By this point, many French had joined the Résistance, while others felt it in their best interest to collaborate with the Nazi regime. Many Jews had fled France, and those who remained behind lived in chronic fear. The Jewish Decrees (France's version of the Nuremberg Laws) saw the Jews of Paris stripped of their livelihoods, property, and rights. As in other occupied areas of Europe, the French Jews were required to wear the yellow stars of David. Inscribed with a single word in the center, Juif (Jew), the badges had to be sewn neatly on the left side of the chest. Failure to do so could land a person in jail – o…

Les Femmes Tondues

It is no great secret that some French collaborated during the Nazi Occupation of France. Some did it for less than admirable reasons, such as political gain, anti-Semitism, or true fascist ideology. Other people were frightened and saw no end to the Occupation, while some were motivated simply by the desire to survive. Many women who collaborated fall into the latter category. Food, clothes, and fuel (among other items) were scarce during the Occupation. Nearly everything needed to sustain life was rationed, and much of France's food and other necessary commodities were shipped to Germany. One way to ensure warmth and a full belly was by making nice with a German soldier. 
In a desperate attempt to survive, some French women took on German soldiers as lovers. It return, the soldier ensured the woman's basic needs were met. Not all women had affairs for material gain - some simply slept with German soldiers because they were lonely. Either way, these sexual liaisons produced man…

La Belle Époque

Introduction Marion Cotillard's character in Midnight in Paris wants to live in La Belle Époque France as she believes it to be Paris' Golden Age. She won't get much of an argument from me - although I'd be more inclined to say I'd like to visit (not permanently reside in) La Belle Époque.
In English, La Belle Époque translates to The Beautiful Age and  arose out of the burgeoning Industrial Revolution. It spans post-Franco-Prussian War (1870-71) through the onset of WWI (1914). And beautiful it was...well, if you were not poor urban workers, anyway.  The People
The ever-expanding bourgeoisie adopted many of the values and ideals from their Victorian neighbors in the north and their own aristocracy (they were aristocratic wannabes). They valued morality, propriety, and modesty, and spent their leisure time partaking in wholesome activities such as strolling through les jardins du Paris (think Maurice Chevalier in the opening scene of Gigi where he sings his creepy, yet…